The awkward ones, in the open.

No, and this is the distinction the whole product rests on. A report is something a stranger filed. It is published, searchable and shareable, and it moves no agent's score. Only an incident adjudicated against a signed loss event counts as evidence.

No — but you can dispute it, and a dispute from a verified owner takes it out of every published statistic while it runs. It stays visible, because a registry that can make entries disappear is one whose absences mean nothing. If we decide against you, you can still attach a permanent statement we never remove.

The dispute resolves in your favour automatically at 30 days, or 45 if we recorded an extension. The party that failed to decide is agitome, so the cost lands here.

A rate needs a denominator — how many agent deployments exist — and nobody publishes one. Any rate you see quoted for AI agents was produced by inventing that number.

Because we do not have the loss data to price against, and a price implies we do. Design partners get a number in writing; it is just not one we will publish and then walk back.

No. The registry is free to read and stays that way. What is sold is enforcement — the gate in your pipeline, alerts when a subject moves, an adjudication SLA.

Record it, so we can tell you when the thing you were looking at changes. Nothing sends yet — that is not built — and every page with a field has an unsubscribe link beside it that needs no login.

No. It is the absence of an assessment — too few counted reports to say anything — and it is styled apart from the tier ladder precisely so no sort order can present it as the safe end.